Florida Learning HubBefore There Were Highways and Subdivisions
Today in Florida History · November 10

Florida Bankers Confront Two Thanksgivings

1939 — A bankers’ bulletin addresses two competing Thanksgiving dates, connecting Florida business with Depression-era economic policy, federalism and shared calendars.

By Wm. E. McMullen II

On November 10, 1939, the Florida Bankers Association issued a bulletin addressing a surprisingly difficult business question: when should banks close for Thanksgiving? President Franklin D. Roosevelt had selected November 23, while Florida governor Fred P. Cone had proclaimed November 30. The association’s bulletin communicated its recommendation that Florida banks observe both dates, seeking a common approach amid a national disagreement. A holiday familiar for family gatherings had become a problem of economic policy, governmental authority and everyday scheduling. [1]

The anniversary belongs to the bulletin, not to the holiday itself. Its importance lies in what the document reveals before either Thanksgiving arrived. Bankers had to translate competing proclamations into practical arrangements. Their response preserved evidence of a moment when Americans could share a holiday’s name without agreeing on its place in the calendar.

Why Roosevelt wanted an earlier date

In 1939, November had five Thursdays. Under the customary last-Thursday observance, Thanksgiving would fall on November 30. Retailers worried that this left too little time before Christmas for the shopping season traditionally associated with the period after Thanksgiving. Roosevelt moved the observance one week earlier, to November 23, hoping the longer season would help business. [2], [3]

The decision came during the Great Depression, when economic recovery remained a powerful concern. From that perspective, a calendar change looked like a relatively inexpensive way to encourage commercial activity. More shopping days might mean more opportunities for merchants to sell goods and employ workers.

But an economic argument did not settle the matter. A holiday also organized school vacations, family travel, football games, printed calendars and expectations formed over many years. Changing the date affected people who had already planned around the old one. An adjustment intended to solve one problem could create several others.

Tradition did not mean a permanently fixed rule

Thanksgiving’s familiar date had developed through proclamations and custom rather than through the later federal rule that fixes it on the fourth Thursday. The distinction gave Roosevelt room to act, but it also left governors able to make different choices within their own states. The national observance and state observances did not automatically move together. [2], [3]

That arrangement is a useful example of federalism: authority and public practice operate at more than one level. A presidential announcement could carry great influence without making every state’s response identical. The resulting disagreement was not simply a battle over which calendar was accurate. It concerned which public decision different institutions would follow.

The problem becomes clearer when one remembers how much depends upon shared time. A holiday works socially because people expect others to be available at the same moment. Separate dates can preserve each government’s preference while making coordination harder for everyone affected by both.

The uncertainty also reached Florida’s attorney general. In an October 6 letter to Cone, George Cooper Gibbs addressed the question of whether both dates would be legal holidays in the state. That earlier correspondence shows that the banking problem had already become a question for state legal officials before the association issued its November bulletin. [4]

Florida chooses November 30

Governor Cone selected the later date for Florida. The Bankers Association’s bulletin explicitly referred to his proclamation and to the president’s earlier date. It also described an association meeting in Miami on October 23 at which a resolution recommended observing both days, conditioned on the president’s official designation of the earlier holiday. The November 10 bulletin carried that organizational decision to members. [1]

This is a specific and revealing chain of events: a national decision, a state decision, a professional association’s meeting and a written bulletin. The document did not create a second national Thanksgiving by itself. It explained how one sector of Florida business intended to handle conflicting calendars.

Nor should a recommendation be mistaken for proof that every bank followed it in exactly the same way. The source establishes what the association communicated. Individual implementation would require additional records. Keeping that distinction allows the document to tell a substantial story without asking it to prove more than it contains.

Why bankers needed an answer

Banking depends upon coordination. Customers need to know when services are available, and businesses plan payments and cash needs around operating days. In 1939, that work took place without the continuous online access familiar today. A closure affected people who needed to complete transactions at a physical institution.

Two competing Thanksgiving dates therefore posed a practical question rather than a merely ceremonial one. If institutions chose different closures, customers could encounter uncertainty about where and when business could be conducted. Observing both dates was one way to seek consistency, even though it meant two holiday interruptions instead of one.

The bulletin illustrates the role of an association between government and individual businesses. It could gather information, discuss a common response and distribute guidance. Such organizations helped turn public policy into working practices. Their records can reveal effects that a presidential proclamation or governor’s statement leaves unexplained.

A national disagreement enters ordinary life

Across the country, opposition came from several directions. Some people defended tradition; others faced practical losses because their plans and printed materials no longer matched the president’s selection. Families living in different states could find that their days off did not coincide. Schools and sports organizers had to reconsider schedules. [2], [3]

These consequences explain why the controversy lasted beyond one announcement. A calendar is a system of agreements. Changing one important date can disturb connections among work, commerce, travel and family life. The Florida bulletin captures the middle of that adjustment, when institutions were still deciding how to respond.

Congress eventually established a common federal rule, and Roosevelt signed the legislation on December 26, 1941. Thanksgiving would fall on the fourth Thursday of November. “Fourth Thursday” is not always the same as “last Thursday,” which is precisely why the distinction had mattered in 1939. [2], [3]

Why it matters

November 10, 1939, offers a Florida entry into a national story about how public decisions reach daily life. The Bankers Association’s bulletin connects the Depression, retail trade, state and federal authority, and the need for dependable schedules. It demonstrates that even a familiar holiday rests on decisions made by institutions and followed by communities.

The story also invites readers to look differently at ordinary documents. A business circular may seem less dramatic than a battle report or a governor’s speech, yet it can reveal the work required to make policy usable. Florida’s bankers were not debating whether gratitude mattered. They were trying to determine when customers should expect the doors to be closed. That modest question preserves a revealing chapter in the history of American timekeeping and public coordination.

Classroom Connection

Reading Prompt

Identify the economic reason for the change and two practical difficulties it created.

Glossary

Proclamation — official public announcement; federalism — division of authority between national and state governments; bulletin — short written communication to a group; coordination — arranging activities so they work together.

Reading Check

1. Which two dates competed in 1939? 2. What did the Florida Bankers Association recommend?

Think and Discuss

Who might benefit, and who might face difficulties, if a major holiday moved with little notice?

Short Writing Prompt

Explain why a shared calendar is a form of cooperation. Include a Florida example from the article.

Teacher Notes and Suggested Answers

1. November 23 and November 30. 2. Observing both dates. November 10 is the bulletin’s date; the association meeting was October 23. Do not describe the bulletin as a law requiring every Florida bank to close.

Sources and Further Reading

  1. Florida Memory — Florida Bankers Association Bulletin No. 6, November 10, 1939. Primary document, transcript and catalog description.
  2. National Archives — Thanksgiving: Another FDR Experiment.
  3. Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library — The Year of Two Thanksgivings.
  4. Florida Memory — Attorney General Gibbs to Governor Cone, October 6, 1939.

Explore the daily archive: Discover more events that shaped Florida.

Today in Florida History