Florida Learning Hub
How Florida Learned to Respond · FLH-0019

Why Some People Stay

The Difficult, Often Misunderstood Decision Florida Families Face Every Hurricane Season

A family at the open door of a small Florida home, a pet carrier on the porch and a loaded car in the driveway, storm clouds approaching.
AI-generated illustration of a Florida family weighing whether to leave, with a pet carrier and packed car at the door. Created with OpenAI for Florida Learning Hub, 2026. Conceptual illustration; not an archival photograph.

A small white dog named Snowball became one of the defining images of Hurricane Katrina, not because of anything the storm did, but because of what came after. As evacuees boarded buses leaving New Orleans, a police officer took the dog from a young boy’s arms; pets were not allowed aboard. The boy cried until he became physically ill, calling the dog’s name. The reported scene raises a question Florida faces every hurricane season: when officials order an evacuation, why do some people stay anyway? Research after Katrina points to specific, recurring and often deeply rational reasons.

Outside Judgment, Inside Experience

During Katrina, people who stayed were widely portrayed as careless or uninformed. Researchers Nicole Stephens of Stanford and colleagues at Princeton examined that framing in a 2009 study in Psychological Science. Surveying both Katrina survivors and people outside the storm’s path, they found a measurable mismatch: from outside, staying looked irresponsible; from inside, it looked entirely different. Those who stayed were, on average, less financially secure than those who left.

Six Documented Factors

Dr. Stacy Willett of the University of Akron’s Department of Disaster Science and Emergency Services, working in part with FEMA, studied why people ignore mandatory evacuation notices. Her work identified six recurring factors: age, gender, previous experience, cost, pets and the influence of other people.

Older residents may face particular barriers to leaving, because of ingrained habits, medical and mobility limits that make a hurried departure hard, and attachment to records, photographs and heirlooms that cannot be packed into one car in a few hours. Some studies also report differences by gender, though decisions depend on many overlapping circumstances.

What It Costs to Leave

Cost is among the most overlooked barriers. Fuel, lodging at inflated rates and lost wages can add up to hundreds or thousands of dollars. Governments open shelters and sometimes provide free transportation to reach them, but these do not close the gap for every family. For a household without transportation, savings or a destination, staying is not a failure of judgment but a material constraint.

Work adds pressure. Researchers summarized by NPR found that people in auto repair, roofing, remodeling and siding often face employer pressure to be available right after a storm, and some fear losing the job if they cannot get back in. Others see cleanup and repair work as an income opportunity.

The Animals

Concern for pets can be a significant barrier to evacuation. Many separations were forced by evacuation policies that did not account for animals at all.

Congress responded with the Pets Evacuation and Transportation Standards Act, signed October 6, 2006, as an amendment to the Stafford Act. It requires state and local emergency plans to address households with pets and service animals in order to qualify for federal disaster funding, and authorizes FEMA to support rescuing, sheltering and caring for animals. A 2021 ASPCA survey found 91 percent of pet owners now plan to evacuate with their pets, though 47 percent of those with prior evacuation experience reported leaving at least one animal behind.

When the Last Storm Wasn’t So Bad

Researchers describe hurricane fatigue: residents who weathered an earlier storm with limited damage tend to underestimate the next. A related effect works against officials. When an evacuation order proves overly cautious in hindsight, residents grow more skeptical of future warnings, leaving emergency managers to weigh the cost of under-warning against the erosion of public trust.

The Person Next Door

Willett’s final factor is other people. Peer pressure and community norms can sway a household toward staying or leaving more powerfully than official messaging. If most neighbors plan to stay, others feel pressure to do the same; where evacuating is the norm, the pressure runs the other way. Anyone who knows a person in a vulnerable area has real influence, simply by offering a concrete invitation to stay somewhere safer.

For current guidance, rely on your county emergency management office and the National Hurricane Center, not on any single article.

Quick Facts

Lead researcherDr. Stacy Willett, University of Akron, post-Katrina research with FEMA
Six factorsAge, gender, previous experience, cost, pets, other people
2009 studyStephens and colleagues, Psychological Science: outside and inside views of staying differ
CostHundreds to thousands of dollars in fuel, lodging and lost wages
Katrina petsPet care can create practical barriers to evacuation
PETS ActSigned October 6, 2006; ties federal disaster funding to pet-inclusive plans
2021 ASPCA survey91% plan to evacuate with pets; 47% of experienced evacuees left one behind
Hurricane fatigueA mild past storm lowers perceived risk from the next

Did You Know?

Researchers found that those who stayed during Katrina were, on average, less financially secure than those who left.

The PETS Act ties federal disaster funding to plans that include pets and service animals.

Some workers feel pressure to stay because employers expect them to be available right after a storm.

Vocabulary

Mandatory evacuation: an order from local officials that residents in a defined area must leave.

Hurricane fatigue: a lowered sense of risk after earlier storms caused little harm.

Service animal: a dog trained to perform tasks for a person with a disability.

Discussion Questions

Why might the same decision look reckless from outside and reasonable from inside?

Which of the six factors could a community address most directly, and how?

Related Articles

FLH-0018 — The Great Florida Evacuations

FLH-0011 — Hurricane Irma (2017)

FLH-0014 — The Birth of Florida Emergency Management

FLH-0016 — How Hurricane Forecasting Changed Florida

Sources

University of Akron News. “Why Some People Won’t Evacuate: FEMA Research.” uakron.edu

Scripps News. “Why Do Some People Choose to Stay Put During Dangerous Hurricanes?” scrippsnews.com

CNBC. “Why Some People Never Evacuate During a Hurricane, According to a Psychologist.” cnbc.com

PMC / NIH. “Evacuation of Pets During Disasters: A Public Health Intervention to Increase Resilience.” pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

NPR. “Why People Stay Home When a Hurricane Is Coming.” npr.org

Natural Hazards Center, University of Colorado Boulder. “Evacuation Obstacles.” hazards.colorado.edu

Animal Legal Defense Fund. “The PETS Act.” aldf.org

The Florida Bar. “A Look at the PETS Act and Related Florida Law in the Wake of Hurricane Ian.” floridabar.org

Stephens and colleagues — Katrina observer and survivor study

ASPCA — 2021 disaster preparedness survey

Return to the FLH Article Library